 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
1110 1010 1110 0000 humm, Ka-on, thank you for this pattern. here are a few that i use to test: 1111 1100 1000 1000 i called this on the stealth bomber. It forced a lot of diagonals for testing. As well, this is simple but a good test of distance (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C704CF8.B1B0E7...ers.com... (...) Yeah, if you're into the whole "vanishing block" routine. Dork :) Iain (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) OK, OK, it was a typo. this leads to an interesting question. how well does your robot handle less or more then 8 blocks? Chris Pretend that Iain did not call me a Dork. (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I don't know about that...I've always admired Iain’s straight-forward and accurate views (at least when they pertain to you). Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I have a problem, normally At the robot contests, I tend to be the person who publicly and very loudly proclaim the GRAND winner at the end of the day. Bruce, in 5 days, when I take home the gold... I will feel just a tiny bit bad about (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes: <snip> (...) Dave Pretend that comments from the Peanut Gallery actually mean something... (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Bruce Sheridan" <bruce.sheridan@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:Grpqvn.9Gv@lugnet.com... (...) Ha! Iain (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
