|
|
 | | Re: A Very Bad Clone Knock-Off
|
| (...) dave, upgrading to THIS dont count. (URL) (17 years ago, 20-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: JLUG?
|
| (...) Once 'Invite To Chat' is implemented a few people will be getting invites. I'll put you on the mental list I'm keeping. (...) Are you only presuming that because it's so mature? (17 years ago, 19-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: JLUG?
|
| (...) And if you closed your eyes during that, you missed seeing the F4 before you heard it. And also hose-head over there did the victory roll with his hands--who's suppose to see that on an album, you dimtwit!! (...) Did our lawyers talk to ya? (...) (17 years ago, 19-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: A Very Bad Clone Knock-Off
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) For you and you alone, we increased the bandwidth of our website. So you can see all these clone knock-off pics in all their 1024 x 768 glory here-- (URL) just realised I didn't link the (...) (17 years ago, 19-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: JLUG?
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip JLUG originated banter> (...) It's a beauty way go. (...) Take off, eh? Jude (17 years ago, 19-Jun-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
