Subject:
|
Re: RCX - The NXT Generation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:26:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4651 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> I'm really loving this continuation of the Mindstorms line. I have no issues
> with the complete revamp and non-backward compatibility.
>
> Here's a few points that I'm pondering--
>
> Knowing the Mindstorms community throughout the world, if there is a way to make
> old sensors/motors/RCX/Scout/Microscouts/etc. work with the new NXT, they'll
> find it in under a month and post schematics/instructions/steps/whathaveyou...
> :)
>
> From reading the press releases and from viewing the pictures, having multiple
> sensors or multi motors on one port thing doesn't look doable, but again, as
> above, if there's a way, the community'll find it if there's a way.
>
> I'm already loving the postings here at LUGNET--I'd say 98 to 2 percent in
> favour of the new NXT. I think that'll change to around 100 when 'normal' (1)
> people get their hands on it.
Well I'm wondering, if the motors have RPM sensors, and the RPM sensor feedback
isn't done in hardware, there may be a way to split each motor port into 1
(unsensored) motor output and 1 sensor input of some kind.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RCX - The NXT Generation
|
| I'm really loving this continuation of the Mindstorms line. I have no issues with the complete revamp and non-backward compatibility. Here's a few points that I'm pondering-- Knowing the Mindstorms community throughout the world, if there is a way (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
