 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Hello! (...) end. Hm, browsing through this Letter-to-CEO-thread I see those who agree to the letter and disagree to the colour change just saying "I agree to the letter", name, age. Those who do not agree to the letter (and possibly agree to the (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Ignore this post (Re: Open letter ...)
|
|
(...) I think the thing that bothers a large number of people is that it's impossible to ignore. There was a group created for discussions on this subject. If someone has an interest in reading and posting on this, they should read lugnet.color. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler wrote: < Stuff we've heard before > In principal I agree with what you are saying. However I take exception to where you are saying it. You need to pay attention to the forum you are posting to. I've already laid the smack (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Hey JoJo! I think both sides of this flame war are guilty of this. To various degrees there are worse offenders, but when people rightly pointed out that this disparaging letter would do more harm than good, they were shouted down. I think, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Hello! (...) OK, to get things straight: The post you just answered to was a re-post because the original post was cancelled for it contained some bad words (quotations of Duane Hess' bad words) that are **ed in this re-post. The original posting (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Johannes 'Jojo' Koehler wrote: < A good point > Ok I understand what happened. Sorry for jumping on you. I've just been frustrated by this topic being jammed into our forums, then people jumping us for discussing it. Additionally the ridiculous (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) (or put "this is a repost with some content changed" when reposting things... just like Calum did) (...) Please don't lay any smack down on JoJo for reposting, after cleaning up the quoted text that got him a timeout. Lay it on me, instead, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) <snmip> (...) Oh we'll be layin' the smack down for whomever we choose... no worries there. rtlT is known as the smack daddy of 'em all! smack smack smack!!! Who shall get smacked (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) I volunteer!!!!!! (...) PICK ME! PICK ME!!! (...) Janey "Hit me with your best shot, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) Awwww, i can't go hittin' no woman!!! What kind of no good for nuttin' flannel wearin' rusty pickup drivin' country hick d'ya think i am??? Oh wait, all those are true! I just laid the smack down on me! Ouch! Well, maybe not too much ouch... (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) Wow Dave, I must say, I'm very disappointed in your obvious SLOS (sexist limits on smack). Then you give yourself a smack job??? I don't think you are allowed to do that publicly. Calls in the SUITS, and charges Dave with a bit of IPS-SO (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) What about... Sticky Lounge...Outrageous Sister ! Sickness Looms, Ominous Symptoms. Saucy Lugnet Outrages Sailors. Suppository Lozenge...Output Soon. (...) another bit of IPS-SO... Irate Postal Service - Significant Order. Ineffective Pathetic (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) I thought David would be good at laying down the smack. Guess I was wrong. Steve - keeping it simple - (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) That aint no woman, that's just Janey... (smack) -Rob A> (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) She's more of a woman than YOU'LL ever be... Er wait, maybe that's not quite the smack I thought it was! (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) She aint no womman? She looks like a womman, she has all the right curves for a womman... she talks like a sailor though... Hmmm... (...) I dunno--I've seen Rob's legs... Dave K (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) YAY! Peter, I was hoping this would pull you out of the woodwork. Sinful Language On Suspension Secret Lives Open Suspicions (...) Intentional Posting Serves Some Others. Introspective Punishments Survives SUITS Oppression. (...) Something (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) LOL, Wow, much too kind..... Calum has dreamy eyes... Dave is King of the Flannel, Iain is the cute one, and Janey gets..... "that aint no woman!" Oh how the truth hurts, how ever will I sleep tonight? Rob don't you have a stacker you should (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) Me? No way.... I am innocent I tell you, innocent! (I exclaim as they make me walk the plank.) Hey, wait Dave, don't be giving all those jolly tars on the hearts of oak a bad name. Janey "On the jack stay, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
