| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
Hi Bruce and Chris,
I agree with what Chris posted on...
> If your robot shows up with that cheap white turkey tying string, and
> needs 18 feet of it.... well, in my humble opinion..... that's not fair
> cause we all know lego never made string that long.
> same goes with the rubber bands.... if a bot shows up with a 10"
> diameter cogged fan belt....... again we all know lego never made this.
What, you never got set 4789, the Lego Technic Fan Belt Accessory Pack?
Sheesh. :) Seriously. No fishing wire. That's all i'm worried about.
> It is with these last two points that I would really like to get
> feedback from the group. As always these games are only loosely
> organized by Calum and Myself. so if the majority of people want to
> change the rules then that's what we'll do.
Well, here's my take on the last two:
Tallying at the end or as towers are produced is a tough question. I'm
undecided on this, but if you count just as a tower is produced you discount
two major strategy types, which is Dave type robots and capping (ie, putting a
single block on other towers)
I think the two RCX issue should remain 1/N. Two RCXs is enough of a
concession already. At least? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | rules
|
| Hi bruce. I hope you don't mind. BUT I'm posting your message here so that other people can add their ideas. this will also cut down on massive e-mails (...) my take on it was the only thing that invalidated a stack was your robot. In other words, (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
