 | | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) From our initial test, there is one thing I can tell you. It doesn't really have to be a "display". We sat there and watched it run (on and off) for about 7 hours, and we didn't get tired of watching it. It's not like watching an event over (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) Sounds to me almost as if Stevie boy is trying to lay down some smack in rtlT's general direction. At least, that's how I'm taking it... ;) Dave K -who has no balls as of yet (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) Feh. Calum (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) No, I just don't think it's possible... (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) First, Love this idea. I love building Marble runs. I had a 4 year Marble run period all through high school. That's all I would build. However I don't get why you want to push the balls through so fast. It makes things more difficult and I (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal - GBC speed
|
|
(...) That's one thing that is still very much in question. We had to pick some number, and 1 bps seemed like a place to start. All the contraption modules I've seen so far run pretty close to that speed. It's hard to see in this picture, but the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) with. For (...) the output (...) Heh. Iain (Viper-what?) (20 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Automation Project Proposal
|
|
(...) Nothing saying it has to limit itself to picking up 1 at a time. Like the "digger" module on your video.... ROSCO (20 years ago, 12-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
