 | | Re: Great News!!!! —David Laswell
| | | | (...) You mean besides the one four years ago? Yes, indeed, 2000 was a leap year. Everyone knows that a year that's divisible by 4 is a leap year (well, barring really young kids and such). Lots of people also know that you end up with a few extra (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Great News!!!! —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) AHh, but the issue was that, iirc, (and maybe I dont), 2000 *wasn't* a leap year--but I could be wrong on that Lemmee go check 2000 calendars... D'oh! My bad! I once again have a faulty recollection! Not unheard of. And I stand corrected. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
