 | | Re: 125 years ago... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Um... { "not losing" == "winning" } == FALSE but { "not losing" & "not drawing" == "winning" } == TRUE So Rosco's question is legit, although hair splitting, it's possible to get a draw in Checkers (both sides have a single king, for example) (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 125 years ago... —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Um, AND tic tac toe! I was just using checkers as an example, honest. (...) This is also true in my view of tic tac toe but not as relatively hard. (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
