 | | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) loop divided into 2 power blocks, rather than one as in the above diagram. With 3 power blocks you can always switch the block the train is heading toward to be compatible with the block it is in so there is never a gap to cross. Once the (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
Yes, you can automate the reversing loops. In fact, using the RCX to do so should be fairly simple, except that it takes 2 of them to do it. (Just using 1 rail for now-) (rcx a)rail-gap-rail(rcx b) The two of them set the polarity the same, such (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
(...) Urp, in the below, when i posted it before, none of the urls are clickable! Sorry about that. And "snip" inside angle brackets IS clickable.... I'm confused. XFUT admin.nntp... (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> Regarding reverse loops and DCC I seem to recall that it's possible to automate them so you don't have to cut gaps that the motor has to coast across See this track diagram (URL) consider what (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
So a few friends gather--talk of DCC comes up. Well, I just happen to have a DCC compiled RCX in my dufflebag and 3 converted LEGO motors (with engines that look remarkably similar to mine--oh wait, they were mine...) So we set up an impromtu layout (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | [rtlToronto] rtlToronto Summer Event Schedule and June Dinner
|
|
Hey folks, Summer 2003 is going to be plain supper wacked out insane* for us here in rtlToronto. Here's an agenda for the next few months. Refer to it as it will be the official place for info: (URL) June 13th will be our next dinner, same place, (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | So Derek, is it Go Train compliant?
|
|
(URL) if you're not sure, I can think of a foolproof way to find out. It requires the Go Train, 6 or 8 more straight track and a regulator. :D Jeff E (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Who-hoo!
|
|
"Chris Magno" <hollynorth@bellnet.ca> wrote in message news:3ED7A71E.E3B8FD...lnet.ca... (...) If by "Special pictures" you mean 32 MByte ACIS files of manifold covers for automation integration, then yes. Iain (who had to download the frigin' thing (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:HFpxx3.6At@lugnet.com... (...) +Doom@Dave Iain (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Mark Riley wrote: <snip> (...) Well, after a few hours of "extensive tests"... I have come to the following conclusion-- This is the greatest thing since LEGO came out with 9v trains and the RCX. Forget the track cleaner (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
