 | | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) this is what I thought. argh. Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) you have a anti-X time and it is BAD...... i can hear it in your voice. -- Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) There isn't an answer--if your accuracy isn't tight, it won't ever be repeatable unless you fix it somewhere else downstream of the system (ie, a positioner chute like Derek's original idea for example) The block that is off its position is (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I agree whole-heartedly with Iain, SLOW that thing down….If ever there was a time for worm to 40t this is it! Bruce (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF5CB.ED778E...ers.com... (...) Yes...? (...) This is why we should not have been posting our times. Argh. Try your best to make it fast. You should decide for yourself how much shaving is (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
