|
|
 | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| Janey Cook wrote: < Something in a drunken stupor, I can only assume > Regardless of whether there is an [official] dinner this Friday. I will be there for you Janey. Derek (19 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| (...) I assume we are, otherwise I'm going to look mighty strange sitting in a cape talking Lego to the waitress... But I must admit..... I did look for the "magic-you-aren't-au...-rtl-icon" post, even went back a few weeks... AND then.... I even (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| You know I think there's a web site you can check. Derek p.s. It's Dot COM. (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Dinner?? (part deux)
|
| I haven't seen any []!! Are we having dinner this friday? Dave K (19 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 page update
|
| Well, enough time has pass that most people weighed in on the idea of the new rule addition suggestion. as is typical with rtlToronto, those few who spoke up, dont have a strong opinion either way. SO, if its ok, with the group, and Calum, then lets (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jun-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
