 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Unfortunately I couldn't make to 19, but I didn't see any designs that I thought should be rejected. The ring bots were an excellent concept, but I expect they're the ones people most complained about. I don't see anything wrong with a bot (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Well I am not really against that, its just more interesting that way. Vitali (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) So, you'll disqualify an entry because it's too simple? Like Rob's monkey-bar "robot"? Steve (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) With the turn out of rtl 19's entries, I think that there sould be some sort of rule this time, that says that your entry much be a robot. Meaning that it should have an RCX that it uses, and some motor/sensors that it uses. As this is a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
| (...) Exactly. The day of the event should be "Prom Day", because you know everyone's going to score some points. I'd call my robot "bi" because it has two functions; it will take blocks in, or you can strap-on the dispenser, and dish them out. The (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
