 | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001) —Michel Magnan
|
| | | The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001) —John Koob
|
| | | | | As everyone knows, I don't have a garage. So, no carpentry party at my place, unfortunately. But I would be able and willing to do all of the painting. Oh, does anyone have brushes I could borrow? :-] John Michel Magnan wrote in message ... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) I did so, and John Neal started to reply, but then figured it would be better to discuss it here so that others could contribute to - and benefit from - the discussion. OK John - you have the floor... 8-) SRC L#765 StRuCtures (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Ahem, well, okay then:-) First off, I will say that there is no current "standard". The GMLTC used 30"x45" tables for our last layout (actually just a skosh longer on each dimension to avoid module buckling). This size is convenient because (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Andreas Stabno
|
| | | | | In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) At first I tried to imagine a rim of LEGO 2x4s reinforcing the tables! :) Build well, Andreas Stabno (URL) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) lol, Oops, I guess I should have been more careful with my wording-- that's funny! -John (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | I agree that the folding legs are the way to go if you want to save space in transporting them and setting up. I used the "conventional" bolt on legs for a year and that was all I could take. I was tired of being the last group to leave the train (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Michel Magnan
|
| | | | For the train clubs that use folding legs, I was wondering if you could answer the following: 1. If you don't have enough Lego bricks to cover the entire surface of the talbles, how do you hold the adjacent tables together? 2. Do you have a problem (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | 1) We don't cover our tables with bricks (they are painted LEGO brick green), we use spring loaded clamps to hold the tables together (they're about a $1 a piece at Home Depot) 2)I always take a few pieces of cardboard with me to shim up the tables (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
