 | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | (...) I seem to recall Michel saying at some point that the table count had turned out to be inaccurate?? Six full sets as in six 30x60s and six 30x30s? That would mean then that two additional 30x60s (plus something lower for the mountain/bridge (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001) —Michel Magnan
|
| | | | The count is 6 large and 6 small, including the large table with the hole for the round house, and the small table with the trench for the elevator and the sunken small table originally for a small port. Half the tables are still in Edmonton at my (...) (24 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bridge status and ideas (for GEMTS 2001) —John Koob
|
| | | | | As everyone knows, I don't have a garage. So, no carpentry party at my place, unfortunately. But I would be able and willing to do all of the painting. Oh, does anyone have brushes I could borrow? :-] John Michel Magnan wrote in message ... (...) (...) (24 years ago, 9-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Steve Chapple
|
| | | | (...) I did so, and John Neal started to reply, but then figured it would be better to discuss it here so that others could contribute to - and benefit from - the discussion. OK John - you have the floor... 8-) SRC L#765 StRuCtures (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Ahem, well, okay then:-) First off, I will say that there is no current "standard". The GMLTC used 30"x45" tables for our last layout (actually just a skosh longer on each dimension to avoid module buckling). This size is convenient because (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Andreas Stabno
|
| | | | | In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) At first I tried to imagine a rim of LEGO 2x4s reinforcing the tables! :) Build well, Andreas Stabno (URL) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) lol, Oops, I guess I should have been more careful with my wording-- that's funny! -John (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | I agree that the folding legs are the way to go if you want to save space in transporting them and setting up. I used the "conventional" bolt on legs for a year and that was all I could take. I was tired of being the last group to leave the train (...) (24 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —Michel Magnan
|
| | | | For the train clubs that use folding legs, I was wondering if you could answer the following: 1. If you don't have enough Lego bricks to cover the entire surface of the talbles, how do you hold the adjacent tables together? 2. Do you have a problem (...) (24 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Table Legs (was Re: Bridge & ideas (for GEMTS 2001)) —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | 1) We don't cover our tables with bricks (they are painted LEGO brick green), we use spring loaded clamps to hold the tables together (they're about a $1 a piece at Home Depot) 2)I always take a few pieces of cardboard with me to shim up the tables (...) (24 years ago, 18-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | |
