 | | Re: TTT board marks or not
|
| (...) Not stupid - That is pretty much the same idea as registration marks, but better. The "board" could just be a simple 2x frame that could sit on, or have a folded paper board laying inside. Something like this: (URL) would also give the bots a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: So... ummm....
|
| (...) No, Chris handles that fine on his own... :) (URL) I'm for is doing it right. Calum (20 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | So... ummm....
|
| When's the next time Calum's going to go on a tirade... Wonder why the world dislikes rtlToronto sometimes? Gee, i dunno Dave K (20 years ago, 15-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: TTT board marks or not
|
| OK, stupid suggestion coming up... Why not print a board that is guaranteed to fit in every printer and then fold (or cut) to that outline? Ralph (20 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | Re: TTT board marks or not
|
| (...) The bot should start not in the airspace that is denoted as common, which in the case of the C4 robot, was the baseplate that held the game board. For us, it's the Tic Tac Toe grid, but not necessarily the page borders. (...) Well, you don't (...) (20 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
|
