 | | LegOz 2001.1 :) —Benjamin Whytcross
| | | | Something not previously mentioned in the report back from LegOz 2000.7. It was decided that LegOz 2001.1 [1] will be held on Saturday Jan 27 at a place to be announced. Just thought everyone might like to know :) [1] subject to renaming IF we ever (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Numbering WAS: LegOz 2001.1 :) —Ross Crawford
| | | | | | (...) Does anyone know how other groups (internationally) organise their numbering? I'm all for individuality, but learning from other peoples mistakes is cool, too... ROSCO (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LegOz 2001.1 :) —David Drew
| | | | | ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Whytcross" <b_whytcross@hotmail.com> To: <lugnet.org.au@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.loc.au.vic.m...ugnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:14 PM Subject: LegOz 2001.1 :) (...) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LegOz 2001.1 :) —Peter White
| | | | | (...) I would add LegOz to the start, so that they relate to each other. LegOz2001.VIC.1 or LegOz.2001.NSW.1 Let's keep the state abbreviations, because that's what these groupings are. -pw (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | | |
