|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Whytcross" <b_whytcross@hotmail.com>
To: <lugnet.org.au@lugnet.com>; <lugnet.loc.au@lugnet.com>;
<lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel@lugnet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 10:14 PM
Subject: LegOz 2001.1 :)
> [1] subject to renaming IF we ever organise this numbering system...ranked
> up there with selecting state "organisers" to give the group structure, and
> sending a letter to LA announcing our group(s). Maybe we should look towards
> doing these soon ???
How about we just use the state system that someone mentioned? ie
2001.VIC.1
2001.NSW.1
We can also use local names;
2001.STUDS.1
A lot more simple than what we have now.
later,
David Drew
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: LegOz 2001.1 :)
|
| (...) I would add LegOz to the start, so that they relate to each other. LegOz2001.VIC.1 or LegOz.2001.NSW.1 Let's keep the state abbreviations, because that's what these groupings are. -pw (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | LegOz 2001.1 :)
|
| Something not previously mentioned in the report back from LegOz 2000.7. It was decided that LegOz 2001.1 [1] will be held on Saturday Jan 27 at a place to be announced. Just thought everyone might like to know :) [1] subject to renaming IF we ever (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.org.au, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.vic.mel)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|