To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.orgOpen lugnet.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / 970
969  |  971
Subject: 
Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org
Date: 
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:45:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1633 times
  
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Wayne McCaul wrote:
If you feel
that sections of the community are useless then don't subscribe to them. What is
so difficult about that?

Wayne, I don't know if your question is meant to be rhetorical to the general
members, or if it's directly specifically at me.  If the latter, then
unfortunately it reads like you missed the point of my post (or I failed to make
it well).  I was not at all presenting an argument for/against the .Lavender
issue.  I was simply trying to point out that LUGNET's policy has long been to
allow non-LEGO discussions as well as subdivions of newsgroups based on
non-LEGO-related considerations, and to compare reactions to the creation of
such newsgroups, both past and present.  And further, to propose that those who
disagree with the existence of non-LEGO discussions on LUGNET should consider
the question I typed in the Subject line of my post:  "Is LUGNET what you really
want?"  It was an attempt to provide something "meaty" for all to think about /
discuss.  Sorry for any confusion.  :]

KDJ

______________________________
LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
 
(...) Replying to myself..., and Wayne, again. ;] Wayne upon re-reading my post and your reply, it dawned on me that perhaps you were in fact addressing my question, "Is LUGNET what you really want?", with your view being yes, and to those that it's (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
 
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle D. Jackson wrote: <snip> (...) No, what I expected when I joined LUGNET, was part resource, part discussion. .space mostly. I saw it as a place to exchange building ideas and maybe a little banter. But what I got (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)  

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR