 | | Re: Sub-Domain LUGS
|
| (...) What you're suggesting isn't necessarily "free". I know on several major hosting companies what you're describing would actually be considered reselling space to someone else because more than the single account holder would be accessing and (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.org)
| | | | | Sub-Domain LUGS
|
| Hi, There are some new LUG's, for example KIDLUG, who's owners have been a little "nervous" about paying domain fees. Which service will I get, can I afford it, and will I have it forever cross their minds. Possibly created by a major LUG, for (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <388196D0.9A54B0E8@v...er.net>... (...) My inclination would be to keep all specific organization groups under lugnet.org (or subgroups thereof). However, in certain areas, I do see a good reason to have (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) I know when this first came up I said that I would love one for NELUG and I still do. For now crossposting and the mailing-list work but a NELUG group would help consolidate things and it would not clutter all of the .loc groups with NELUG (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) Agreed... IF the groups want them. PNLTC at one point I think was asked and declined. A wrinkle, though... There's the current lugnet.trains.org already in existence. would a putative bayltc (bayltc is just forming, and may or may not remain (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) Ok, but AFAIK there aren't any lug newsgroups right now. There should at least be newsgroups for LUGs and LTCs made under the appropriate heirarchy. lugnet.org.us.gmltc lugnet.org.us.gmlug lugnet.org.us.nelug lugnet.org.us.wamalug etc... -Tim (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) And one that I (really!) would not like to see implemented, for two reasons. 1. automatic crossposting is, in general, a bad idea, as has been discussed here at length before. Too easy to get unintended results, too hard to maintain the (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) One problem that I see with that is then people on those loc-groups who don't want to see org-info get it anyway, and threads are spread over multiple groups messily. I think the newsgroups for LUGs idea is cool though :) Richard (26 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) My dad and I have both been using that word for years :) -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (26 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
| | | | | Re: Newsgroups for LUGs?
|
| (...) I like this idea as well, and had thought of it. I agree, it is a great idea. Oh, and I like that new word,"automagically" :) Ryan (26 years ago, 15-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org, lugnet.org.us)
|
|
