 | | Re: Age limitations —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) I had been containing the discussion primarily to lugnet.org.us because it seemed like one of the major concerns was liability (and as a person involved in organizing a LUG, that is really my only concern), but I did entertain the thought that (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Age limitations —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Which could be viewed as a weakness of the web interface - the generalized, higher-level groups get blasted with *all* the messages, not just the generalized, higher-level messages. Steve (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Frank, Steve: Have you tried the link in the yellow box that says View plain (without subgroups) ? --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) Aha!! I often saw some groups in "plain" view but never realized what instigated that... thanks! -Shiri (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) The /news/traffic/ page will also send you that way yonder. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Age limitations —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I knew that link was around somewhere, but had lost site -- errr, sight -- of it. Steve (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| | | | |
