|
|
 | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Oh I understood perfectly well what you were doing but I just took advantage of the spelling mistake to misunderstand for humorous (I hoped) effect. It would appear that the sergeant missed this point but that's not entirely surprising. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Reply to my own post so I can insert my sig (that I keep forgetting about!) and to see how replying to one's self looks on legnet. Man do I wish that this interface had editing capability. But I am happy that Firefox 2.0.0.3 has built-in (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Geeze Tim, you too can post "not nice " messages. Each forum has its "Forum Nazi's." While I am off inventoring, why don't you go and stick some bricks together. John P (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) I think I do get it. (...) I appreciate Tim's contribution to the community here, few come close to his involvement and knowledge. His MOC production is, I think, unequalled in recent times. I do not think LUGNET is 'his forum', but I (...) (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) Thanks sergeant. Now be a good boy and do some more inventories. Tim (19 years ago, 1-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.test, FTX)
|
|
