|
|
 | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) Hmmmm - shouldn't it be X-Original-Followup-To? Would it send out notifications to test.bar, after the FUT's updated? Or does the post silently appear? Of course, this doesn't affect mail/news readers, but I don't think you can do anything (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (same insults as before) Test whether ForceFUT stays through a cancel cycle. (it did) (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.test.bar, David Koudys wrote: (some rather typical blather) Test ForceFUT to just plain old test (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) Foo back at yoo. -Tim (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.foo)
| | | | | Re: test of FUT override
|
| (...) So to conclude, we have 3(fut)*5(blah) I'd say divide by foo and were just about there... Dave K (22 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.test.bar)
|
|
