 | | Re: test
|
|
(...) Great! Looks like you made it! Your MSOE settings now match what you filled in at the news-posting setup. But again, you could also re-do the news posting setup to add the "III" onto the end of your name if you want to keep the III. Either way (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
As per Todd's request of info change... (26 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | testing auto-sig
|
|
Franklin W. Cain | fwcain@yahoo.com | (URL) | (URL) OF MY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL PURPOSES IS _STRICTLY_ PROHIBITED. . . . MAKE MY (LAWYER'S) DAY, PUNK! (26 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | tset
|
|
TEST (Please ignore if possible!) O'GEL ® We here at O'GEL® are developing a new mind control substance called h0LDE9/1 (Holde for short) O'GEL® thinks that this substance will revolutionize the way people will not think. To order HOLDE please call (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | TEST
|
|
Let's see if this works (26 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Test
|
|
(...) pffft (26 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Test
|
|
(...) Surprisingly, my response is: This is also a test. (26 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: Test 123
|
|
Test again Adam Ogle <oglewood@lcs.net> wrote in message news:FMuD7A.Fu0@lugnet.com... (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Test
|
|
Test (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Test 123
|
|
Test 123 (26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | MAC test 2
|
|
(26 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | plittelit
|
|
plidder og pladder (26 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
Just a test post. (26 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
testestestestesteste...testestest estestestestestestes...estesteste stestestestestestest...stestestes testestestestesteste...testestest TEST(please ignore if possible!) Fatal Warning!!! Erin Windross is not responsible for broken eyes, missing arms, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: will <pre></pre> tags work?
|
|
(...) Hey, cool. I just wish Dejanews^H^H^H^H would be a bit more consistent about including their version of that link.. Jasper (26 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | test
|
|
test (26 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: will <pre></pre> tags work?
|
|
(...) Here's how it's stored: (URL) can always click the "View Raw Message" link on any article to see it this way. --Todd (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: will <pre></pre> tags work?
|
|
(...) As I did, you mean? Yeah. ;) Jasper (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: will <pre></pre> tags work?
|
|
(...) Viewing source - yup, looks like you're right. It's not saved that way, though - if you viewed the post with a regular newsreader, you'd see <pre> just fine (as plain old none-htmlized ascii text). -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
| |
| | Re: will <pre></pre> tags work?
|
|
(...) Wanna bet all <'s and >'s get replaced with < and > respectively? Jasper (26 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.test)
|
