Subject:
|
Re: A brick in page 10 of #7777
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.pun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:43:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
484 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Manfred Moolhuysen writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> > > Sets that this part contained:
> > ROFL :)
>
> Hey, I can't help the part is an antiquity, I just answered the question.
> And I've used past tense on purpose :-)
No, I think that it's that he is laughing at the notion of a set contained
in a part. Usually it's the other way round, parts are contained in sets...
he's just laughing at your transposition typo, that's all. I think.
++Lar
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
