Subject:
|
Re: Science Fiction (was Re: Transit Time to Mars)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 16:08:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
498 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Selçuk Göre writes:
> >
> > By the way, why no body mentions Douglas Adam's Hitchiker series?..:-)
>
>
> Possibly because, while it's entertaining, it's also fairly straightforward
> farce with uneven characterization and plot. Don't get me wrong--I've read it
> all, and I quite enjoy it, but it lacks, to me, much of the strength of these
> other "canonical" works we've discussed.
>
> Dave!
I do think it's canonical farce, up there with Harvard Lampoon's
"Bored of the Rings" and Gaimen/Pratchett's "Good Omens."
--
jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Science Fiction (was Re: Transit Time to Mars)
|
| (...) it (...) Ugh! I found "Bored" to be perfectly dreadful! As for Pratchett, he differs from Adams, and always has, in that Pratchett's work has been satire without being baggy-pants farce in line with the stereotypical (as commonly held by some (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
119 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
