Subject:
|
Re: A UNIX directory/path question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:58:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
174 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, "Chris Ernest Hall" <fozboot@best.com> writes:
>
> In this situation, to access technica you would use:
>
> ../../filename
>
> To access something in header you would useL
>
> ../../header/filename
>
> you can use as many .. as you want - each time you use it, you go up one
> step in the hieararchy.
Caveat lector, although '..' works great 99.9% of the time, be careful in
the presence of symbolic links!
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A UNIX directory/path question
|
| Todd Lehman: (...) This warning is only appropriate when you are working directly with a Unix file system. In URL's "../" always refers to the URL you get by cutting from the end of the current URL until you have removed two "/", and then adding one (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A UNIX directory/path question
|
| (...) easily (...) In this situation, to access technica you would use: ../../filename To access something in header you would useL ../../header/filename you can use as many .. as you want - each time you use it, you go up one step in the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
