 | | Re: New LUGNET server hardware details —Jan-Albert van Ree
| | | | (...) Not to mention the fact that current IDE drives are just as reliable as SCSI. SCSI is nice if you need maximum speed and can live with little storage space (SCSI above 74 GB is rare still, IDE goes to 250GB easily But the generated heat and (...) (20 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New LUGNET server hardware details —Tim David
| | | | | | (...) Yeah, sorry, I wasn't saying I though that you should have gone the SCSI route (I thought my anecdotes would have showed that!) more that I thought it was interesting the move away from SCSI for custom built servers. A few years ago it would (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New LUGNET server hardware details —Matthew Miller
| | | | | (...) Look at (URL). Although I need to update that page. Right now, our install server is way underpowered, but it should be getting upgraded sometime this spring (just in time for BU Linux 4.0, hopefully). Because of this, it's only available on (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | | |
