 | | Re: Black Holes —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | (...) Because it is a good (2D) description of its gravitational potential. Jacob (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Black Holes —Stefan Garcia
|
| | | | (...) I figured as much. So they really are infinitely dense pinpoints then, right? -Stefan- p.s. Cool rowing boat. (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Black Holes —David Laswell
|
| | | | | (...) That's the prevailing theory. Another is that they really are a toilet flush, with all of the sucked in matter getting spat out somewhere else through a spatial wormhole of some sort. Carl Sagan tossed that out as a possibility in Contact (...) (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Black Holes —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | (...) Perhaps it's converted into 'dark matter'. Allister (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Black Holes —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | | (...) :-) Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Black Holes —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | (...) I haven't been inside one recently, but that's the theory (IIRC). (...) Thanks. Play well, Jacob (21 years ago, 11-Aug-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
