 | | Wanna' Solotrek?
|
|
We all know Solotrek is closing up shop: (URL) I bet someone out there would love to get their hands on this: (URL) can you spare a dime (or 500,000)? Matt (22 years ago, 14-Jan-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTR: The Two "Towels"
|
|
(...) Too bad some people just can't help but exalt and rave over the trilogy. Sheesh, can people ever stop complaining about the 'dialogue problems' or 'improper adaption' and 'lack of adherence to the original storyline'?!!! Let me sum this into (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LoTR: The Two "Towels"
|
|
(...) My son loved it and it got him to read "The Hobbit", so it can't be all bad! Lucas wins the goofy-names contest hands down. Tolkien, on the other hand, wins the tedious and confusing names contest: Melkor, also known as Morgoth, and named "The (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: A space physics question
|
|
(...) Great job on the .space page so far! A few points first: - in the absence of gravity, the force on the pulleys will only exist if the object in tow is continuously accelerating. Remember, accelerating can mean following a curved path as well (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: A space physics question
|
|
(...) Great job on the .space page so far! A few points first: - in the absence of gravity, the force on the pulleys will only exist if the object in tow is continuously accelerating. Remember, accelerating can mean following a curved path as well (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
|
