To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 4048
4047  |  4049
Subject: 
Re: Geek Speak?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:49:31 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@SAYNOTOSPAMmattdm.org
Viewed: 
14 times
  
Jeff Jardine <jwjardin@diespam.mccain.ca> wrote:
"Eighty-four percent of the Usage Panel disapproves of the construction to
impact on, as in the phrase 'social pathologies, common to the inner city,
that impact heavily on such a community.' Ninety-five percent disapprove of

This usage is clearly metaphorical. Where's the problem?

--
Matthew Miller           mattdm@mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) One clue is they had to use an adverb to make the meaning. impact as a metaphorical verb is a new and awkward shortcut for "to make an impact". If over time everybody understands that 'to impact' means 'to place a burden on', then it will be (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Geek Speak?
 
(...) Yes, 'impact' can be used as a verb, but not when the author/speaker should be using 'affect' or 'influence.' People seem to use it when they're trying to make a greater 'impact' on their audience, and that bothers me. I'm not alone on this: (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR