| |
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> > This is actually a network design issue, not a platform issue.
>
> The problem isn't that the network can't handle the load, it's that it
> shouldn't _have_ to. For god's sake, the whole point of a local cache
> is to reduce network load.
You're not thinking of the same kind of environment. I have to
provide hundreds of workstations for tens of thousands of casual
users. There's no such thing as a "local" anything when those users
move around and use random machines at random locations.
--
The pieces you want and nothing else - easy online bidding!
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Perl rules!
|
| (...) Exactly. There is such a thing as local, but it only lasts the session. Therefore, a local cache should not persist beyond the session. You could possibly supplement that with a smaller (as server diskspace is a hell of a lot more expensive (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
| On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 22:46:46 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> wrote: <roving desktops> (...) Well, I was trying to make a joke. Sorry, weong group, I know. (...) The problem isn't that the network can't handle the load, it's that it shouldn't _have_ (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
