 | | Re: Math/Optics Problem —Shiri Dori
|
| | | (...) Alrighty. Since I have been studying this stuff for the past month and am supposed to pass a test about it, let's see what I can do. (...) Depends. Does it "focus"? The "fisheye" constant you're referring to is, in technical terms, called the (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Math/Optics Problem —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Really? I woulda thought it had more to do with the zoom rather than the focus. But then again, I'm really not sure how the lenses in cameras work. I guess my assumption (based on nothing at all I think) is: {A}--------B--------...E)--F--[G] (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Math/Optics Problem —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | It's amazing how much physics and math I have forgotten, so let me simply note that the focus of the camera isn't going to change the proportions of the objects. The focal length will. The perspective will change as your lens measurement changes (in (...) (23 years ago, 14-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Math/Optics Problem —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Ahhh-- so perhaps I've been getting stuck on photography terminology. I had assumed the "focus" in Shiri's response to relate to the fuzziness of the resulting image, not the "focal length" which affects the zoom level. That makes just about (...) (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
