Subject:
|
Re: learning languages (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 21:41:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1046 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:02:11 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> wrote:
> I have to admit, I'm something of an anti-COBOL bigot. That has obviously
> clouded my judgement, but I can't see what COBOL could do that FORTRAN
> wasn't already doing more cleanly and efficiently, on the same platforms.
FORTRAN in the same sentence as clean and efficient, without a
negative. *shakes head* must be a misparse.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: learning languages (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
| (...) It's a relative thing. Back then, Algol 60 hadn't even been developed, and FORTRAN hadn't been muddied up with more stuff. (why, I remember when I had to do my programs on punched cards... once you punch it. there's NO undo!... and I had to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: learning languages (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
| (...) I have to admit, I'm something of an anti-COBOL bigot. That has obviously clouded my judgement, but I can't see what COBOL could do that FORTRAN wasn't already doing more cleanly and efficiently, on the same platforms. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
