To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 316
315  |  317
Subject: 
Re: Perl rules!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad.dev
Followup-To: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:45:14 GMT
Viewed: 
2144 times
  
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999 16:11:41 GMT, "Don Heyse"
<donnell_heyse@adc.spam.go.away.com> wrote:

I would like LDAO/LDLITE better if the moving piece was drawn first, then
the rest of the picture.  I don't think the version I have works that way.
About half of the time I don't even want to see the rest of the model.

That's a good suggestion.  Especially because it's something I can make
LDAO do.  As opposed to some really nifty suggestions I've received which
would require changing LDLite, or would be so processing-intensive that
they aren't practical.

Steve
[follow-ups set to lugnet.cad.dev]



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Perl rules!
 
(...) OK, relative-addressing mode is good. But it doesn't require segmented memory. All it requires is an instruction format with a defined result. For example, the conditional-jump instructions on the 6502 microprocessor[1] only used relative (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR