Subject:
|
Re: 2nd Potter poster image
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Jun 2001 05:14:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
446 times
|
| |
|
|
Sorry Shiri...I don't do the whole Macintosh/Windows flame war thing.
After all, they are ALL personal computers, no matter the processor/OS/etc.
in the box. I just prefer to work WITH my computer, not ON it. I see Macs as
tools, there to get the job done right...Windows systems are more like
hobbies, you can spend as much time working ON them as with them, and the
results are iffy at best. I spend my money in the way I see most wise-that's
Apple for me.
Believe me, I've used both professionally, I've taught both professionally,
and I've administrated mixed networks. Macintosh is the easiest and most
powerful hardware to configure and use, MacOS is the easiest and most
powerful OS to configure and use-the benchmarks don't lie. Even
Windows-centric folks like C|net have to admit that the Mac is a better
system (see:
http://home.cnet.com/software/0-429669-8-6112332-1.html?tag=mnn.sw.429669-8-6112332-7.back2.429669-8-6112332-1),
even if they CAN'T keep their bias hidden after MacOS won their shoot-out.
So that's my 2¢ on the subject (and to get the ¢ sign, all I have to do is
press ALT + 4).
Matt
In lugnet.harrypotter, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.harrypotter, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > Sorry Nick. I use a Macintosh, and it's a closely guarded secret. It's also
> > incredibly easy...on Mac. PeeCee/Windoze users have something like a 52 key
> > combination to get a simple ¢.
> >
> > So, in closing:
> > `¡™£¢?§¶•ªº–!=œ<sum>´®†¥¨ˆø<pi>“‘«åß?ƒ©???¬…æ??ç??˜µ<=>=÷`/?‹›fifl‡°·‚—±Œ„´‰<caron>Á¨ˆØ?”’»ÅÍÎÏ´´ÓÔ?ÒÚƸ?Ç??˜Â¯<breve>¿
>
> Hagagaga-wha?
>
> Gosh, gotta love those macs for *something*, right? <grin, duck and run>
>
> -Shiri (who actually does love macs for some things. They just happen to be
> the less important ones.)
> XFUT .o-t.geek
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
