Subject:
|
Re: Security?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:00:03 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cmasi@cmasi.STOPSPAMchem.tulane.edu
|
Viewed:
|
176 times
|
| |
|
|
"J.D. Forinash" wrote:
>
> In article <GA53J7.n1M@lugnet.com>, Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote:
> > Last week at my job I had the misfortune of attending a mandatory seminar on
> > Information Security, which amounted to little more than "don't leave
> > sensitive documents on the bus." Through the course of it, though, the
> > lecturer discussed the various commonly-available software systems for
> > hammering through password protection, and he gave some time projections for
> > how long it would take to "guess" a certain type of password.
> > That's all well and good, but it occurred to me that my system locks me
> > out if I botch my password three times, so why are these intruder programs
> > able to make millions of attempts with no problem? More to the point, why
> > does my system bother to limit me to three tries, which in practice will
> > only result in inconvenience to me, since the interloper can apparently make
> > as many attempts as it wants?
>
> I suspect that lockouts after password retries aren't to secure the system,
> they're to secure the user. Draconian measures tend to reinforce the idea
> that passwords are _important_, and you should _remember_ them. [0]
>
> Oh, and we (system administrators) like watching people squirm when they
> have to come to our offices and admit they can't type their own password
> given three chances. [1]
>
> On your other subject, nobody cracks passwords by trying to log in to the
> machine; they get the "password file" (which _is_ encrypted on any modern
> system) and crack against that. The implication here is that not only
> do security people not trust people breaking in, they don't trust people
> with legitimate accounts on the system. I consider this a good thing;
> the last thing I need is someone spamming the world from my account
> instead of their own.
>
> [0] Unfortunately, this last bit tends to get parsed as "write them down"
>
> [1] Not really, but that's what the rest of the world thinks, so who are
> we to argue?
>
> -JDF
> --
> J.D. Forinash ,-.
> foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu ( <
> The more you learn, the better your luck gets. `-'
This statement is coming from an individual who forgets passwords that must be
changed every 30 days.[1] Aren't most passwords acquired through human
engineering anyway?
Chris
1. Now, I ask someone else to do the stuff on the system that required me to
remember the constantly changing password.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Security?
|
| (...) I suspect that lockouts after password retries aren't to secure the system, they're to secure the user. Draconian measures tend to reinforce the idea that passwords are _important_, and you should _remember_ them. [0] Oh, and we (system (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
