To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 244
243  |  245
Subject: 
Re: learning languages (was: Re: Perl rules!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 03:53:44 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@SPAMCAKEnovera.com
Viewed: 
1165 times
  
Sproaticus wrote:
I have to admit, I'm something of an anti-COBOL bigot.  That has obviously
clouded my judgement, but I can't see what COBOL could do that FORTRAN
wasn't already doing more cleanly and efficiently, on the same platforms.

job security baby.

Hey, did you hear about the new Object Oriented COBOL? It's true.
They've come up with a name for it!

ADD 1 TO COBOL.

--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: learning languages (was: Re: Perl rules!)
 
(...) I have to admit, I'm something of an anti-COBOL bigot. That has obviously clouded my judgement, but I can't see what COBOL could do that FORTRAN wasn't already doing more cleanly and efficiently, on the same platforms. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 13-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR