| | Re: NQC in Boston University Linux :)
|
| (...) Oh yeah: those major differences are RH 6.[01] -> RH 6.2. RH 6.2 -> BULinux: - includes nqc :) - uses bash version 2; none of this bash w/ optional "bash2" silliness - kerberos4 (via a pam module -- much nicer than needing every app to be made (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: NQC in Boston University Linux :)
|
| (...) yup, I installed it in /usr/local for all the dept. :) (...) bash? zsh :) (...) nod, pam is nice. (...) nog... heh, if you have to put gaim, put licq too? (unless gaim is not what I think it is...) (...) mmmm... tripwire - let's me snoop on (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | Re: NQC in Boston University Linux :)
|
| (...) I don't think zsh is 100% backwards compatible with sh, so it's not an ideal replacement. Might be reasonable to add though. (...) Yeah, gaim is what you think it is. If I get requests for licq, I'll put it in. (...) We're looking at coda. But (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |