Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Mar 2000 04:41:55 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.antispamORG
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2188 times
|
| |
|
|
Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote:
> to take a look. What it is, basicly, is an open sourced browser,
> that's was loosly based on netscape's code (I think). I is free, and
> I do not believe it belongs to netscape.
My understanding is that very little of it is based on Navigator code at
this point. Early versions of Mozilla were, but then the developers decided
that there was too much cruft and started over from scratch, this time with
A Plan. This is largely what's responsible for the "delay" in Mozilla's
release. (It's actually pretty much on schedule.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:29:30 GMT Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote concerning 'Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer': (...) I think you're misunderstanding the point. Mozilla (the browser Todd is referring to) is _not_ written or sold by (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
