Subject:
|
Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 01:06:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1982 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Mike Stanley writes:
> Which browser are you using on Linux that you would call "better" than
> IE5? Seriously. Every time time I try some flavor of Netscape
> product for Linux it just ends up making me run screaming back to
> browsing on Windows. In fact, I would rather run VMware and NT or
> 2000 so I could use IE5 than use Nav/Communicator on Linux.
I love Linux, I hate Windows, but I have yet to see any Linux web browser
other than Lynx which even comes remotely close to MSIE5 in how well it works.
Netscape sucks, Mozilla sucks.
But -- Mozilla will get better, and it will squash MSIE in the long run. It's
just a matter of time (maybe another year).
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) I'm really curious as to why you believe that. Really. If Netscape were interested in or capable of producing an IE-killer browser, why haven't they done it already? Given the almost universally agreed-upon crappiness of Communicator 4.7 what (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why MSIE sucks for the HTML writer
|
| (...) Which browser are you using on Linux that you would call "better" than IE5? Seriously. Every time time I try some flavor of Netscape product for Linux it just ends up making me run screaming back to browsing on Windows. In fact, I would rather (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
