|
|
 | | Re: Relativity Question
|
| (...) 8^) Certainly, but one of the two parties is moving relative to the inertial reference frame and one is not. Am I correct in thinking that the occupant of the ship will experience Doppler Shift of light while the "stationary" observer will (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: How to maximize 90-piece bags?
|
| (...) Me too. Jon, would you be willing to share your image file with the lazy once you know what it actually results in your getting? ++Lar (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Optimal banding *shape* (was Re: How to maximize 90-piece bags?
|
| In my playing with Brick-o-liser (which has been hampered by the fact that it's very very slow.... even on a fast connection) the stock images are all larger than the 44x44 plate area, requiring resizing. Are people using actual 44x44 sized images (...) (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Relativity Question
|
| (...) Right. The theory of *gravity* is just a theory. (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Relativity Question
|
| (...) Everything in science is a theory. But Relativity is a working theory -- its various effects (time dilation, etc.) have actually been proven with high-speed jets, atomic clocks, and so on. Paul Davidson (24 years ago, 8-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space)
|
|
