|
|
 | | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
| (...) And thank you for it. However in this case, it's a customer requirement that the user, in the ordinary course of events, *never see* the old page. Yes, a clever user can go schlepping around in their cache, and that's OK, but the ordinary user (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: ibm and novell?
|
| (...) definite possibility, ibm _loves_ notes. (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: ibm and novell?
|
| (...) it just makes me wonder if big blue only wants the directory stuff or if they want to get rid of groupwise to promote *shudder* notes... (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: ibm and novell?
|
| (...) of the other contenders include Sun, Microsoft, AOL, and the Guy Down The Street. Personally, I think it'd be cool if Novell were bought out by TLC, but we're probably not *that* marketable yet. :-P Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Forced refresh of html pages instead of getting them from browser cache
|
| (...) ...<smile> I think their point is that the user should be always up-to-date, even without knowing it; and without having to realize the page is outdated and reloading. At home I have the page reload every time, but here I can't control (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
