|
|
 | | Re: VT100 over the web
|
| (...) I'd tend to agree with you on that. VT100 with half duplex continually sends screen updates with every keystroke (1), after which it needs to render the escape codes (termcap?) properly. Server performance would take a serious hit, both in (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Web hosting
|
| (...) Well I can highly recommend Pair networks ( (URL) ) which is where I have (URL) and (URL) and it is where LUGNET is hosted. Its quite possible it is more than you want to spend though. To get SSI and CGI scripts enabled you need at least a (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Web hosting
|
| Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I can cheaply get web space with SSI and CGI-scripts enabled? Case Western Reserve University will give me web space next year, but without the extra goodies I want/need to make my site easier to maintain. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: VT100 over the web
|
| (...) I see them in the correct form for charset=iso-8859-1, which is what you're using. :) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: VT100 over the web
|
| (...) Heheh.. Mine has that ü thing also, as well as ç,ö,þ,ð,ý and Ý (I know, you even can't see the last four in correct form..:-) selÇuk gÖre ..:-) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | VT100 over the web
|
| Is it even possible? My researches so far have not turned up a product, and in thinking about the problem, the VT100 protocol stream is richer than HTML, in some ways of looking at it. We are trying to determine the feasibility of replacing client (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Fun with squirm
|
| (...) way) too small for me under linux... [ -> .admin.general ] (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Fun with squirm
|
| (...) Won't work like that, 'cause Squid is pretty strict about the validity of hostnames. (Technically, they shouldn't start with a number, either, but I guess it's not that strict.) You could use something like "q7121", though. (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Fun with squirm
|
| (...) Hey, that's pretty cool! (I'm not using squirm but I can imagine how it works from your description.) What happens if you do this?-- regexi (2 URLs) #!/bin/sh echo -ne "Location: (URL) type in, say, ^7121 --Todd (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
|
