 | | Re: "Yodd" Lehman
|
|
(...) Sure, isn't that how everyone makes webpages these days? Who wants to bother typing on a keyboard? That's so 1900's! :-) --Todd (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: "Yodd" Lehman
|
|
(...) Hmmm... d'you jot down posts and later scan them with OCR? Or something else, maybe? I thought OCR doesn't read handwriting...? -Shiri FUT .o-t.geek (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: My starship update (very small)
|
|
Jon Palmer wrote in message <38f4d445.2584556@lu...et.com>... (...) it (...) (Am I X-posting this correctly? Anyone?) I use Microsoft <GASP> FrontPage 98. It's very simple for computerless-minded people like myself, and my father before me -- But (...) (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: New newsgroups for LEGO Direct and the LEGO Company
|
|
(...) The word you're looking for is "pithy" :) -- Asher (24 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about HTTP cookies
|
|
(...) RTFM (Read The Persistent Client State HTTP Cookies Spec! :) (URL) it looks at the 'path' field of the cookie. --Todd (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Question about HTTP cookies
|
|
Hey all, When looking in my cookie jar, I see 4 cookies for LUGNET: NEWSPOST=x, NEWSMAIL=x, NEWSGROUPFILTER=x, /=x However, when I trace an HTTP GET, the only cookies transmitted in the query are NEWSGROUPFILTER and / . e.g.: GET (URL) HTTP/1.0 (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ripping Vinyl to Digital
|
|
(...) started, (...) Following-up my initial post with some experience and recent findings. First off: CompUSA has a special on CD-Rs, today only. I don't have the newspaper ad with me, but the deal is a 5pack of 74min discs, free after rebate, 1 (...) (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: CGI question
|
|
(...) In core, yah, but wot about in packed data structs on tapes? --Todd (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: CGI question
|
|
(...) at least at the unix epoch, most of the code won't have to be changed - the assumption here is that we won't be using 32-bit boxes anymore, so a long int will be a lot longer :) :) Dan (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: CGI question
|
|
(...) Oh, but no one will *possibly* be using the same code in 29 years. We don't need to worry about that. *much laughter* The unix epoch rollover is gonna be another one.... (24 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
