Subject:
|
Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 19:43:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
355 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Maggie Cambron writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > D'oh! And I've blown it! I'm sure Beatty reads OT.Fun, and now he'll
> > spot the joke at his expense.
>
> And I bet we'll find he could care less!
Just not very MUCH less (bah-dump... bump!)
> > Anyway, my post was clearly labeled for Maggie--what are you doing reading
> > it? 8^)
>
> Larry OTOH couldn't care less! :-)
>
> Maggie (who is doomed to spend the rest of the day trying to think of more
> examples-- is it any wonder I'm not crazy?)
In what way is this doom, I am wondering?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
| (...) Hey, I like Shirley! But I guess that just shows to go we all have our little idiosyncrasies. (...) And I bet we'll find he could care less! (...) Larry OTOH couldn't care less! :-) Maggie (who is doomed to spend the rest of the day trying to (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
