 | | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Hey! He was great in... I mean, I liked his performance in... What about...? And then there was that one with.... Okay, but he was pretty good as Lex Luthor's sidekick, and we should take it easy on him in any case, since he has to deal with (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Hey, I like Shirley! But I guess that just shows to go we all have our little idiosyncrasies. (...) And I bet we'll find he could care less! (...) Larry OTOH couldn't care less! :-) Maggie (who is doomed to spend the rest of the day trying to (...) (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Ya. Exactly. That's what I'm saying! (...) It wasn't labeled for Maggie *only*. And besides, you know I read everything. ++Lar (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Just not very MUCH less (bah-dump... bump!) (...) In what way is this doom, I am wondering? (23 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | And one for Dave! Was Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Hmm, good point. Anyway I found another one for Dave! Teaser heard on radio: "Tonight on the channel 7 news: Dan ___ uncovers an airport security risk so obvious it's being ignored!" Maggie (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
