 | | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
This isn't NITPICK FORUM on the IBMTEXT conferencing disk, but what the heck! (...) The above paragraph contains two sentence fragments, and a number of poorly structured sentences that suffer from excessive choppyness. Suggested rewrite: "I don't (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
(...) lugnet.off-topic is often the next-best thing. (...) Thank you very little. :p I *did* chop that message, didn't I? (...) Ooo, ick. Quick, Larritarians! Time to send more love offerings! He might not get to build, but at least he can feel (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
(...) YES! Because, just as with NITPICK FORUM, and unlike, say, a post to RTL, we're all friends here and there's little or no chance of someone misinterpreting some gentle teasing and good clean fun as an actual flame or anything. (the above (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <36B714ED.99B21C94@v...er.net>... (...) Why? Some of us specialize in grammar flames, you know. Spelling, grammar, and rudimentary communication skills are often overlooked these days, and you see what happens. Do (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
(...) Hmmm? What was that you said? I must not have been listening. ;) Jeff (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Creator Activity Book
|
|
(...) See the netiquette guide I posted a URL to a while back. There was a hierarchy of flame types included. (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
