Subject:
|
Re: A.I.?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Jul 2001 16:49:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1103 times
|
| |
|
|
in article GG51t8.46L@lugnet.com, Jon Palmer wrote:
> The ending was very ambitious but I think for the most part it was pulled
> off. It seemed to me the type of sequence you encounter in classic sci fi
> novels and stories but rarely on the screen. The film could have obviously
> ended with the shot pulling back from coney island but that might have been
> the easy route. Also worth noting is that the final coda was Stanley's
> original ending in his premise. It was not in fact added to be more
> "Spielbergian" like some people think.
That's part of what I liked about the movie as well. I thought it felt very
"Real SF" in comparison to most movies, which are generally dumbed down and
flashed up to make the most money.
Anyway, I liked it too. :^)
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A.I.?
|
| **minor spoilers** I don't really want to get into an argument or anything, (everyone is of course entitled to their opinion ) but I liked this film a lot. As a Spielberg movie AND as a Kubrick movie. Obviously it would have been much different if (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
