 | | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I can neither confirm nor deny that there was any wallpaper present. However I CAN say no wallflowers were present, we all particiapted enthusiastically. No minifigs were harmed in the creation of this post. At least that's the story we're (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct. —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | (...) Aw, come on... not even a Timmy or a Jar Jar? Rule 5: No one is to hurt any Timmys or JarJars in any way. ... if there's anyone watching. Rule 6: There is NOOO...OOO Rule 6. ;^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Wait, Jar Jar's a minifig? Never mind what I said, then. (...) Why am I getting this sense of Deja(r) vu about this topic? ++Lar (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: This is not a meeting with Lego Direct. —Santosh Bhat
|
| | | | | (...) I don't think we'd ever find out either way. As long as those cronies at Lego Direct insist on hiding the evidence. Lar, are you sure there weren't any minifigs crouching behind any grassy knolls at the summit? What about the 1x1 tiles? did (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Timmy (was:This is not a meeting with Lego Direct.) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6AD3C49.C906%s...ink.com... (...) the (...) OK. That's it. I've gone along with this Timmy / Jar Jar thing now, without knowing what the @#$% started it all in the first place! Can someone (...) (24 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
