 | | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) Hah! Shows how much you know, you big ignoramus you. It's not a sieve, it's a collander. ;) Olympically, LFB (24 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) I'll sift through this debate eventually... ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) You're such a whiz with this! :-, Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
"Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message news:G8D2yJ.FyF@lugnet.com... (...) I'm flushed at how far you guys have taken this. It pee's me off when you do this, wipe that smirk off your faces now. -Tim (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) This conversation sure is dribbling off. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) I have no choice but to agree as you're in the know, too. ++Lar (how many puns can YOU find in there? You may need to vocalise) FUT trimmed to .pun only (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6A62C2C.CCEA%s...ink.com... (...) do (...) Man, that was draining. -Tim (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) We better evacuate. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) No re-using puns in the same thread! You lose. ;^) ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6A6EAA5.C5FA%s...ink.com... (...) ...before we all get wiped out. -Tim (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:B6A6EB3B.C5FE%s...ink.com... (...) you (...) Oh crap, I'm such a turd for forgetting. -Tim (24 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) Can we wash our hands of this thread at last? -Brian (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) when (...) If I had my way it'd be flushed down the toilet.... ROSCO (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with Darwin's theory
|
|
(...) You really had to dredge that one up from the bowels. Can't we keep our language clean and toidee? In loo of that, I think the lot of you should just scat. wishing you warm seats at midnight, LFB (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
